Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyers / Blog / Premises Liability / How Surveillance Footage Can Prove Liability in Premises Cases

How Surveillance Footage Can Prove Liability in Premises Cases

Surveillance Camera

You slipped. You fell. And somewhere on the ceiling of that grocery store, hotel, or casino, a camera caught the whole thing. So why is the property owner already pushing back? Because footage fades fast, and so does your leverage if you don’t act quickly.

What Surveillance Footage Actually Shows

Security cameras don’t lie. In premises liability cases, that footage can reveal exactly what the property owner knew, what they ignored, and how long a hazard existed before someone got hurt. This is the heart of what lawyers call “notice.” Did the owner know or should they have known about the dangerous condition?

A wet floor from a drink spill two minutes before your fall is very different from a puddle that employees walked past for three hours. Surveillance footage is often the only way to establish which situation you were actually in. Beyond the hazard itself, camera footage can document:

  • The exact time the dangerous condition appeared
  • Whether any employees noticed and failed to act
  • How many people walked by (or around) the hazard before you
  • Whether warning signs were placed or conspicuously absent
  • The precise moment and manner in which the accident occurred

In Las Vegas especially, where casinos and hotels run 24/7 surveillance systems across every inch of their properties, this footage is almost always available. The catch? It doesn’t stay that way for long. Many properties overwrite their security recordings within 24 to 72 hours. Once that footage is gone, it’s gone.

Why You Need to Move Fast

Under Nevada law (NRS § 11.190(4)(e)), you generally have two years from the date of your injury to file a premises liability lawsuit. Two years might sound like plenty of time, but the most critical evidence window closes in the first 48 to 72 hours. A formal legal hold letter sent to the property owner can stop footage from being overwritten, but that only works if it’s sent before the recording cycles out.

The same urgency applies to witness statements, inspection logs, and maintenance records. Property owners and their legal teams move fast after an accident. You should too.

The Stronger the Footage, the Harder It Is to Deny

Think about how this plays out in court or at the negotiating table. A property owner’s attorney can always argue that the floor “just got wet” right before you fell or that staff “routinely” inspected that area. But surveillance footage doesn’t give them that wiggle room. A timestamp showing a hazard existed for four hours is compelling evidence that’s very hard to overcome.

In Nevada, modified comparative fault rules under NRS 41.141 mean that if you’re found 50% or more at fault for the accident, you can’t recover anything. Property owners’ insurers know this, and they will try to shift blame onto you. Clear, unedited footage of the accident can shut that argument down before it gains traction.

Talk to a Las Vegas Premises Liability Lawyer

If you were hurt on someone else’s property, the clock is ticking on the evidence that could make or break your case. At Mainor Ellis Injury Lawyers, we know how to move quickly to preserve surveillance footage and build a strong claim on your behalf. Contact us today for a free consultation with Las Vegas premises liability lawyers who know how to hold negligent property owners accountable.

Source:

leg.state.nv.us/nrs/NRS-011.html#NRS011Sec190

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn